StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MOBX$2.32-3.33%
Fair $2.32+0.0%

MOBX

Mobix Labs, Inc.

Technology / SemiconductorsNasdaqCM

$2.32

-0.08 (-3.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.32Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-14.6M · quality 59.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 0unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · MOBXLocal privado en este navegador · Mobix Labs, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$37M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

13729.5%

↑

Gross Margin

50.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

-19.51

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$14

TradingView lightweight chart

MOBX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.320Periodo -97.6%
Fair value: $2.320

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-102.3%

FCF / Net income

0.22x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.9M · net income $-46.1M · FCF $-10.1M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

50.5%— pts

Operating margin

-373.0%— pts

Net margin

-465.4%— pts

FCF margin

-102.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$9.9M$9.9M$6.4M$1.2M$3.3M—
Net Income$-46.1M$-46.1M$-20.0M$-39.6M$-23.9M—
EBITDA$-41.7M$-41.7M$-18.9M$-34.9M$-22.4M—
EPS-10.10-10.10-7.50-13.84-8.34—
Gross Margin50.5%50.5%39.6%-32.4%13.8%—
Operating Margin-373.0%-373.0%-699.5%-2903.9%-716.7%—
Net Margin-465.4%-465.4%-311.0%-3237.0%-721.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-19.51-19.510.88-1.53-0.67—
Current Ratio0.230.23————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-10.1M$-10.1M$-18.4M$-14.6M$-16.5M—
Returns
ROE13729.5%13729.5%-362.3%741.8%253.4%—
Valuation
P/B——5.38———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth53.9%53.9%426.3%-63.0%——
EPS Growth-34.7%-34.7%45.8%-66.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -63.8%

Total return

-63.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-7.50 → -10.10

Residual

-63.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-63.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.