StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MRP.BO$90.00+0.00%
Fair $90.00+0.0%

MRP.BO

MRP Agro Limited

Consumer Defensive / Food DistributionBSE

$90.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $90.00Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-42.2M · quality 30.3/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · MRP.BOLocal privado en este navegador · MRP Agro Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

17.1x

↑

EV/EBITDA

8.1x

↓

ROE

21.2%

↑

Gross Margin

10.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$90
$78$124

TradingView lightweight chart

MRP.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $88.50Periodo -36.9%
Fair value: $90.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+49.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.61x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.04B · net income $69.0M · FCF $-42.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.6%+5.7% pts

Operating margin

7.8%+6.2% pts

Net margin

6.6%+5.5% pts

FCF margin

-4.1%-5.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.04B$1.04B$432.0M$283.3M$309.1M
Net Income$69.0M$69.0M$10.0M$3.1M$3.4M
EBITDA$105.8M$105.8M$13.4M$4.2M$4.7M
EPS6.786.783.031.020.38
Gross Margin10.6%10.6%4.3%4.3%4.9%
Operating Margin7.8%7.8%3.0%1.6%1.6%
Net Margin6.6%6.6%2.3%1.1%1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.140.050.00
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-42.2M$-42.2M$-47.9M$14.4M$2.8M
Returns
ROE21.2%21.2%7.7%3.8%4.4%
Valuation
P/E17.1417.14———
EV/EBITDA8.128.12———
P/B2.812.81———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth140.6%140.6%52.5%-8.3%—
EPS Growth123.8%123.8%197.1%168.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

5.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$7.99

Spread vs growth

118.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

7.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$9.66

Spread vs growth

116.4%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

8.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$15.56

Spread vs growth

115.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -26.9%

Total return

-26.9%

Start / end P/E

39.9x → 13.1x

EPS bridge

3.03 → 6.78

Residual

-83.3%

EPS growth+123.8%
Multiple rerating-67.3%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-83.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.