StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
MRT$1.82-6.19%
Fair $1.82+0.0%

MRT

Marti Technologies, Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationNYSE American

$1.82

-0.12 (-6.19%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.82Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-19.7M · quality 68.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 0unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · MRTLocal privado en este navegador · Marti Technologies, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$156M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

61.8%

↑

Gross Margin

9.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

-1.29

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

MRT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.820Periodo -81.2%
Fair value: $1.820

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-39.0%

FCF / Net income

0.37x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $39.2M · net income $-41.4M · FCF $-15.3M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.3%— pts

Operating margin

-51.0%— pts

Net margin

-105.6%— pts

FCF margin

-39.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$39.2M$39.2M$18.7M$20.0M$25.0M—
Net Income$-41.4M$-41.4M$-73.9M$-33.8M$-14.2M$-841299.00
EBITDA$-22.2M$-22.2M$-55.2M$-17.0M$-3.3M—
EPS——-1.17-0.67-0.32—
Gross Margin9.3%9.3%-253.0%-64.2%-31.9%—
Operating Margin-51.0%-51.0%-340.0%-141.2%-59.0%—
Net Margin-105.6%-105.6%-395.9%-168.8%-57.0%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.29-1.29-0.01-0.020.37—
Current Ratio0.900.90————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-15.3M$-15.3M$-26.1M$-19.7M$-13.7M—
Returns
ROE61.8%61.8%120.2%103.4%-187.5%41.4%
Valuation
P/B————59.78—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth110.3%110.3%-6.8%-19.8%——
EPS Growth——-74.3%-109.4%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -38.9%

Total return

-38.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.17 → n/d

Residual

-38.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-38.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.