StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NCI.V$0.78+1.30%
Fair $0.78+0.0%

NCI.V

NTG Clarity Networks Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationTSXV

$0.78

+0.01 (+1.30%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.78Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-499861.00 · quality 44.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NCI.VLocal privado en este navegador · NTG Clarity Networks Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$37M

P/E

7.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.3x

↓

ROE

20.2%

↑

Gross Margin

36.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.22

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

NCI.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.780Periodo -85.8%
Fair value: $0.780

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+67.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.69x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $83.4M · net income $5.5M · FCF $-3.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

36.3%-1.7% pts

Operating margin

12.0%+1.9% pts

Net margin

6.6%-0.4% pts

FCF margin

-4.6%-9.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$83.4M$83.4M$56.1M$27.7M$17.7M
Net Income$5.5M$5.5M$9.8M$1.7M$1.2M
EBITDA$10.6M$10.6M$12.1M$2.7M$2.0M
EPS——0.200.050.05
Gross Margin36.3%36.3%37.1%31.7%38.1%
Operating Margin12.0%12.0%18.4%8.7%10.1%
Net Margin6.6%6.6%17.5%6.2%7.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.220.220.54-2.37-1.17
Current Ratio3.023.02———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.8M$-3.8M$1.5M$-499861.00$783135.00
Returns
ROE20.2%20.2%77.9%-52.8%-18.4%
Valuation
P/E7.807.808.404.003.00
EV/EBITDA3.303.306.886.226.08
P/B1.361.366.44——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth48.5%48.5%102.4%57.1%—
EPS Growth——300.0%0.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -71.5%

Total return

-71.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.20 → n/d

Residual

-71.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-71.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.