StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NDO.AX$0.27-8.62%
Fair $0.27+0.0%

NDO.AX

Nido Education Limited

Consumer Defensive / Education & Training ServicesASX

$0.27

-0.03 (-8.62%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.27Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $15.5M · quality 37.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NDO.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Nido Education Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$60M

P/E

8.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

11.9x

↑

ROE

5.8%

↓

Gross Margin

93.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.90

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

NDO.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.265Periodo -72.4%
Fair value: $0.265

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+43.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

9.1%

FCF / Net income

2.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $169.9M · net income $6.5M · FCF $15.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

93.3%-6.7% pts

Operating margin

14.3%+15.9% pts

Net margin

3.8%+15.5% pts

FCF margin

9.1%+17.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$169.9M$169.9M$163.6M$93.4M$57.9M
Net Income$6.5M$6.5M$14.7M$-18.1M$-6.8M
EBITDA$22.5M$22.5M$25.9M$-13.6M$4.1M
EPS——0.06-0.16-677.50
Gross Margin93.3%93.3%94.5%92.8%100.0%
Operating Margin14.3%14.3%17.3%-9.0%-1.6%
Net Margin3.8%3.8%9.0%-19.4%-11.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.901.901.491.741.59
Current Ratio0.260.26———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$15.5M$15.5M$27.3M$-58000.00$-5.0M
Returns
ROE5.8%5.8%11.8%-16.5%-6.1%
Valuation
P/E8.838.8312.09——
EV/EBITDA11.8811.8813.78——
P/B0.540.541.431.04—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.8%3.8%75.2%61.1%—
EPS Growth——140.2%100.0%—
Dividend Yield35.8%35.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -28.3%

Total return

-28.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → n/d

Residual

-64.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+35.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-64.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.