StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NEA.MC$9.62-0.41%
Fair $9.62+0.0%

NEA.MC

Nicolás Correa, S.A.

Industrials / Specialty Industrial MachineryMCE

$9.62

-0.04 (-0.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $9.62Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.9M · quality 57.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NEA.MCLocal privado en este navegador · Nicolás Correa, S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$117M

P/E

9.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.9x

↓

ROE

13.0%

↑

Gross Margin

55.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.15

↓
52-Week Range$10
$9$12

TradingView lightweight chart

NEA.MC price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $9.620Periodo +164.3%
Fair value: $9.620

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.09x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $119.1M · net income $12.0M · FCF $-1.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

55.5%+2.2% pts

Operating margin

12.7%+2.7% pts

Net margin

10.1%+0.9% pts

FCF margin

-0.9%-5.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$119.1M$119.1M$121.5M$109.9M$98.2M
Net Income$12.0M$12.0M$13.7M$10.5M$9.0M
EBITDA$17.5M$17.5M$19.4M$15.2M$12.5M
EPS——1.130.870.75
Gross Margin55.5%55.5%55.7%55.3%53.3%
Operating Margin12.7%12.7%14.1%11.0%9.9%
Net Margin10.1%10.1%11.3%9.6%9.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.150.150.060.110.16
Current Ratio1.901.90———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.0M$-1.0M$10.5M$3.9M$4.8M
Returns
ROE13.0%13.0%16.2%14.3%13.6%
Valuation
P/E9.729.727.107.606.62
EV/EBITDA5.945.944.034.573.91
P/B1.261.261.151.090.90
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-2.0%-2.0%10.6%11.9%—
EPS Growth——29.8%16.0%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.3%

Total return

-14.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.13 → n/d

Residual

-17.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-17.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.