StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NEO-B.ST$6.62+6.15%
Fair $6.62+0.0%

NEO-B.ST

NEO-B.ST

Technology / Software - ApplicationStockholm

$6.62

+0.38 (+6.15%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.62Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-30.9M · quality 59.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -39.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · NEO-B.STLocal privado en este navegador · NEO-B.ST
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$331M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

324.9x

↑

ROE

-39.3%

↓

Gross Margin

54.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$7
$1$10

TradingView lightweight chart

NEO-B.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6.560Periodo -48.8%
Fair value: $6.620

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+77.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $130.9M · net income $-15.0M · FCF $2.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

54.9%-37.0% pts

Operating margin

-6.3%+85.5% pts

Net margin

-11.4%+81.1% pts

FCF margin

1.8%+189.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$130.9M$130.9M$65.3M$61.6M$23.3M
Net Income$-15.0M$-15.0M$-24.9M$-32.2M$-21.6M
EBITDA$866809.00$866809.00$-16.7M$-26.6M$-17.7M
EPS——-0.59-0.77-0.51
Gross Margin54.9%54.9%63.2%47.7%91.9%
Operating Margin-6.3%-6.3%-34.5%-51.7%-91.9%
Net Margin-11.4%-11.4%-38.1%-52.3%-92.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.010.020.01
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$2.4M$2.4M$-36.1M$-30.9M$-43.8M
Returns
ROE-39.3%-39.3%-65.2%-87.3%-31.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA324.90324.90———
P/B7.757.758.84——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth100.7%100.7%5.9%164.5%—
EPS Growth——22.9%-49.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +17.6%

Total return

+17.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.59 → n/d

Residual

+17.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+17.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.