StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NEWTRAC.BO$4.73+0.85%
Fair $4.73+0.0%

NEWTRAC.BO

Newtrac Foods & Beverages Limited

Consumer Defensive / Food DistributionBSE

$4.73

+0.04 (+0.85%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.73Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.4M · quality 69.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NEWTRAC.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Newtrac Foods & Beverages Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$91M

P/E

4.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.9x

↓

ROE

16.1%

↑

Gross Margin

5.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$5
$4$12

TradingView lightweight chart

NEWTRAC.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.730Periodo +4.0%
Fair value: $4.730

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-25.3%

FCF / Net income

-9.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $640.8M · net income $18.0M · FCF $-162.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

5.1%— pts

Operating margin

4.1%— pts

Net margin

2.8%— pts

FCF margin

-25.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$640.8M$640.8M$238.5M——
Net Income$18.0M$18.0M$21.9M$-1.7M$-1.1M
EBITDA$25.9M$25.9M$22.0M$-1.7M$-1.1M
EPS1.011.014.57-0.35-0.07
Gross Margin5.1%5.1%8.9%——
Operating Margin4.1%4.1%8.5%——
Net Margin2.8%2.8%9.2%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.01—-0.15-0.13
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-162.3M$-162.3M$27.8M$-1.4M$-1.1M
Returns
ROE16.1%16.1%-43.8%2.3%1.6%
Valuation
P/E4.684.6811.44——
EV/EBITDA2.902.9010.16——
P/B0.750.75———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth168.7%168.7%———
EPS Growth-77.9%-77.9%1405.7%-408.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-25.4%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.42

Spread vs growth

-52.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-12.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.51

Spread vs growth

-65.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.82

Spread vs growth

-75.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -52.7%

Total return

-52.7%

Start / end P/E

2.2x → 4.7x

EPS bridge

4.57 → 1.01

Residual

-89.0%

EPS growth-77.9%
Multiple rerating+114.2%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-89.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.