StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NEXCOM.CO$1.65+0.00%
Fair $1.65+0.0%

NEXCOM.CO

Nexcom A/S

Technology / Software - ApplicationCopenhagen

$1.65

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.65Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 14/F
F-Score: 2/9
Declining Revenue

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF n/d · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

14/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years
Thesis & Journal · NEXCOM.COLocal privado en este navegador · Nexcom A/S
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$41M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

526.0%

↑

Gross Margin

29.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

-5.65

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$5

TradingView lightweight chart

NEXCOM.CO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.650Periodo -85.3%
Fair value: $1.650

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $7.7M · net income $-16.6M · FCF —

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.3%+16.9% pts

Operating margin

-154.6%+70.5% pts

Net margin

-215.6%+60.8% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$7.7M$7.7M$9.9M$11.5M$7.8M
Net Income$-16.6M$-16.6M$-16.6M$-9.3M$-21.6M
EBITDA$-9.0M$-9.0M$-4.2M$-3.9M$-13.5M
EPS-0.67-0.67-0.73-0.50-1.54
Gross Margin29.3%29.3%35.4%42.9%12.4%
Operating Margin-154.6%-154.6%-92.7%-67.5%-225.1%
Net Margin-215.6%-215.6%-167.9%-81.2%-276.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-5.65-5.652.641.399.99
Current Ratio0.420.42———
Returns
ROE526.0%526.0%-355.7%-145.8%-1400.3%
Valuation
P/B——21.796.4819.44
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-22.0%-22.0%-13.7%46.4%—
EPS Growth9.3%9.3%-48.3%67.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -63.3%

Total return

-63.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.73 → -0.67

Residual

-63.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-63.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.