StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NHCFOODS.BO$1.22+4.27%
Fair $1.22+0.0%

NHCFOODS.BO

NHC Foods Limited

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsBSE

$1.22

+0.05 (+4.27%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.22Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 68/B
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-142.5M · quality 45.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 8/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

68/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NHCFOODS.BOLocal privado en este navegador · NHC Foods Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$802M

P/E

6.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.5x

↓

ROE

6.6%

↓

Gross Margin

4.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.29

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

NHCFOODS.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.220Periodo -82.7%
Fair value: $1.220

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+54.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.4%

FCF / Net income

-1.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.01B · net income $118.5M · FCF $-142.5M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

4.5%-10.5% pts

Operating margin

3.1%-0.6% pts

Net margin

2.0%+0.9% pts

FCF margin

-2.4%-1.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.01B$6.01B$3.48B$2.06B$1.62B
Net Income$118.5M$118.5M$68.1M$23.5M$17.6M
EBITDA$219.5M$219.5M$164.2M$77.6M$65.4M
EPS——0.330.060.05
Gross Margin4.5%4.5%9.5%10.5%14.9%
Operating Margin3.1%3.1%3.9%2.5%3.6%
Net Margin2.0%2.0%2.0%1.1%1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.290.290.401.321.10
Current Ratio2.352.35———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-142.5M$-142.5M$-376.6M$-25.0M$-16.9M
Returns
ROE6.6%6.6%8.3%8.5%6.9%
Valuation
P/E6.106.102.7967.2373.18
EV/EBITDA5.505.505.3024.9923.57
P/B0.450.450.665.685.04
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth72.8%72.8%68.8%27.1%—
EPS Growth——445.0%33.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +32.6%

Total return

+32.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.33 → n/d

Residual

+32.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+32.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.