StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NISMGMT.BO$50.48-1.37%
Fair $50.48+0.0%

NISMGMT.BO

NISMGMT.BO

Industrials / Security & Protection ServicesBSE

$50.48

-0.76 (-1.37%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $50.48Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 27% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $82.2M · quality 47.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NISMGMT.BOLocal privado en este navegador · NISMGMT.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1000M

P/E

5.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.9x

↓

ROE

12.3%

↑

Gross Margin

10.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.55

↑
52-Week Range$50
$36$108

TradingView lightweight chart

NISMGMT.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $54.74Periodo -46.6%
Fair value: $50.48

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.0%

FCF / Net income

0.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.02B · net income $186.7M · FCF $82.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.8%-3.6% pts

Operating margin

6.1%-2.1% pts

Net margin

4.6%+0.1% pts

FCF margin

2.0%+3.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.02B$4.02B$3.78B$3.41B$2.94B
Net Income$186.7M$186.7M$183.8M$161.4M$132.5M
EBITDA$294.6M$294.6M$331.9M$296.1M$266.8M
EPS9.439.439.288.156.69
Gross Margin10.8%10.8%12.2%13.9%14.4%
Operating Margin6.1%6.1%7.9%7.9%8.2%
Net Margin4.6%4.6%4.9%4.7%4.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.550.550.680.760.88
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$82.2M$82.2M$117.2M$75.4M$-33.9M
Returns
ROE12.3%12.3%13.8%14.1%13.4%
Valuation
P/E5.245.24———
EV/EBITDA5.895.89———
P/B0.660.66———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.4%6.4%10.9%15.8%—
EPS Growth1.6%1.6%13.9%21.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-22.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$4.48

Spread vs growth

23.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-10.5%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$5.42

Spread vs growth

12.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-0.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$8.73

Spread vs growth

2.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -46.6%

Total return

-46.6%

Start / end P/E

11.1x → 5.8x

EPS bridge

9.28 → 9.43

Residual

-0.7%

EPS growth+1.6%
Multiple rerating-47.5%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.7%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.