StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NKTX$3.14-3.38%
Fair $3.14+0.0%

NKTX

Nkarta, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGS

$3.14

-0.11 (-3.38%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.14Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-104.1M · quality 69.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 7Warnings: 1unknown: 7
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -33.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · NKTXLocal privado en este navegador · Nkarta, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$225M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-33.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.24

↑
52-Week Range$3
$2$4

TradingView lightweight chart

NKTX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.140Periodo -93.4%
Fair value: $3.140

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2019–2025 · 6 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.86x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-104.1M · FCF $-89.9M

2019-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Income Statement
Revenue—————$0.00—$115000.00
Net Income$-104.1M$-104.1M$-108.8M$-117.5M$-113.8M$-86.1M$-91.4M$-21.1M
EBITDA$-112.8M$-112.8M$-119.0M$-125.8M$-116.3M$-84.6M$-50.7M$-21.9M
EPS-1.41-1.41-1.60-2.40-2.61-2.62——
Operating Margin———————-19433.9%
Net Margin———————-18327.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.240.240.200.320.22———
Current Ratio12.9612.96——————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-89.9M$-89.9M$-104.1M$-114.3M$-104.1M$-73.0M$-51.0M$-20.3M
Returns
ROE-33.3%-33.3%-26.7%-43.0%-30.6%-34.3%-28.4%82.7%
Valuation
P/B0.740.740.421.090.68———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth11.9%11.9%33.3%8.0%————

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +80.5%

Total return

+80.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.60 → -1.41

Residual

+80.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+80.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.