StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NOSN.OL$1.26+3.00%
Fair $1.26+0.0%

NOSN.OL

NOS Nova AS

Industrials / Pollution & Treatment ControlsOslo

$1.26

+0.04 (+3.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.26Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-114.0M · quality 70.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -99.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · NOSN.OLLocal privado en este navegador · NOS Nova AS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$53M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-99.3%

↓

Gross Margin

78.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.22

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

NOSN.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.200Periodo -9.8%
Fair value: $1.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-657.3%

FCF / Net income

1.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.2M · net income $-48.9M · FCF $-53.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

78.8%— pts

Operating margin

-564.9%— pts

Net margin

-600.1%— pts

FCF margin

-657.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$8.2M$8.2M$4.0M——
Net Income$-48.9M$-48.9M$-109.8M$-193.0M$-133.8M
EBITDA$-46.5M$-46.5M$-104.5M$-187.7M$-130.9M
EPS——-4.92-8.64-5.99
Gross Margin78.8%78.8%100.0%——
Operating Margin-564.9%-564.9%-2920.9%——
Net Margin-600.1%-600.1%-2779.6%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.220.220.030.040.03
Current Ratio1.341.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-53.6M$-53.6M$-114.0M$-184.1M$-115.8M
Returns
ROE-99.3%-99.3%-134.1%-100.8%-34.9%
Valuation
P/B1.071.07———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth106.2%106.2%———
EPS Growth——43.1%-44.2%—
Dividend Yield41.7%41.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +31.9%

Total return

+31.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-4.92 → n/d

Residual

-9.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+41.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-9.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.