StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NPRA.CN$0.36-23.40%
Fair $0.36+0.0%

NPRA.CN

Nepra Foods Inc.

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsCanadian Sec

$0.36

-0.11 (-23.40%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.36Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.9M · quality 67.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NPRA.CNLocal privado en este navegador · Nepra Foods Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$43M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

59.5%

↑

Gross Margin

21.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

-1.42

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

NPRA.CN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.360Periodo -45.5%
Fair value: $0.360

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-19.2%

FCF / Net income

0.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.3M · net income $-2.3M · FCF $-1.2M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

21.1%+8.2% pts

Operating margin

-35.1%+60.5% pts

Net margin

-37.3%+73.0% pts

FCF margin

-19.2%+97.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$6.3M$6.3M$4.2M$6.5M$6.1M
Net Income$-2.3M$-2.3M$-4.5M$-6.2M$-6.7M
EBITDA$-986523.00$-986523.00$-3.1M$-5.0M$-6.0M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.08-0.14-0.35
Gross Margin21.1%21.1%7.9%16.6%12.9%
Operating Margin-35.1%-35.1%-83.3%-88.2%-95.7%
Net Margin-37.3%-37.3%-109.0%-95.0%-110.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.42-1.42-1.962.040.88
Current Ratio2.942.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.2M$-1.2M$-1.9M$-5.1M$-7.0M
Returns
ROE59.5%59.5%162.1%-305.2%-195.6%
Valuation
P/B———1.344.05
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth50.3%50.3%-36.2%7.8%—
EPS Growth75.0%75.0%42.9%60.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +260.0%

Total return

+260.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.08 → -0.02

Residual

+260.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+260.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.