StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
NVNI$1.15-5.74%
Fair $1.15+0.0%

NVNI

Nvni Group Limited

Technology / Software - ApplicationNasdaqCM

$1.15

-0.07 (-5.74%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.15Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $936000.00 · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · NVNILocal privado en este navegador · Nvni Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$13M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

75.7%

↑

Gross Margin

65.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.43

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$16

TradingView lightweight chart

NVNI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.150Periodo -98.8%
Fair value: $1.150

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+16.5%

FCF CAGR

-54.4%

FCF margin

0.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $196.7M · net income $-112.9M · FCF $936000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

65.0%+7.4% pts

Operating margin

-13.8%-6.7% pts

Net margin

-57.4%+34.5% pts

FCF margin

0.5%-7.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$196.7M$196.7M$193.3M$169.0M$124.5M
Net Income$-112.9M$-112.9M$-86.2M$-254.7M$-114.4M
EBITDA$-16.8M$-16.8M$22.9M$-206.0M$-79.4M
EPS——-28.47-110.31-4.13
Gross Margin65.0%65.0%63.4%60.9%57.6%
Operating Margin-13.8%-13.8%18.0%-0.9%-7.1%
Net Margin-57.4%-57.4%-44.6%-150.7%-91.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.43-0.43-0.57-1.41-0.75
Current Ratio0.150.15———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$936000.00$936000.00$22.5M$-9.4M$9.9M
Returns
ROE75.7%75.7%71.5%439.5%115.8%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA——43.24——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.8%1.8%14.4%35.7%—
EPS Growth——74.2%-2574.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -66.2%

Total return

-66.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-28.47 → n/d

Residual

-66.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-66.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.