Technology / Software - ApplicationNasdaqCM
$6.64
-0.32 (-4.60%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 32% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.7M · quality 60.3/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
34/100
D
Piotroski
3/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$18M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
N/A
•ROE
-60.5%
↓Gross Margin
20.1%
↓Debt/Equity
0.09
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2010–2025 · 15 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
—
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
-11.4%
FCF / Net income
0.59x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $54.3M · net income $-10.5M · FCF $-6.2M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $54.3M | $54.3M | $66.1M | $37.8M | $11.7M | $7.7M | $5.7M | $5.9M | $5.7M | $6.0M | $4.7M | $4.0M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $-10.5M | $-10.5M | $-13.4M | $-3.8M | $-9.2M | $-8.1M | $-2.8M | $-1.4M | $-1.2M | $-3.9M | $-2.6M | $-2.1M | $6490.00 | $624118.00 | $-4.8M | $-8.7M | $-11.6M |
| EBITDA | $-9.4M | $-9.4M | $-19.6M | $-19.7M | $-6.7M | $-6.3M | $-1.7M | $-836000.00 | $-865772.00 | $-1.3M | $-1.4M | $-1.8M | $34418.00 | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | -4.40 | -4.40 | -6.50 | -2.20 | -9.60 | -19.80 | — | — | — | -1215.00 | -1713.00 | -5850.00 | 0.00 | 8100.00 | — | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 20.1% | 25.7% | 30.0% | 21.3% | 24.0% | 21.5% | 20.8% | 18.1% | 19.2% | 22.9% | 24.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -14.2% | — | -61.5% | -85.6% | -35.7% | -18.9% | -19.7% | -26.3% | -34.7% | -50.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Margin | -19.3% | -19.3% | -20.3% | -10.0% | -78.2% | -104.8% | -48.6% | -23.5% | -20.9% | -65.6% | -55.1% | -52.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 2.56 | 2.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $-6.2M | $-6.2M | $-5.7M | $-4.2M | $-4.3M | $-4.3M | $-871883.00 | $-729397.00 | $-620516.00 | $-348438.00 | $-1.1M | $-711791.00 | $-9772.00 | — | — | — | $-829512.00 |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||||
| ROE | -60.5% | -60.5% | -49.2% | -11.7% | -35.5% | -46.2% | -488.9% | -215.7% | -86.7% | -211.8% | -112.1% | -71.6% | 11.9% | 1233.5% | 281.7% | 1377.4% | 160.6% |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||||
| P/B | 1.02 | 1.02 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | -17.8% | -17.8% | 75.0% | 222.4% | — | 36.0% | -3.1% | 2.5% | -4.6% | 27.8% | 18.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth | 32.3% | 32.3% | -195.5% | 77.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 29.1% | 70.7% | — | -100.0% | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+0.6%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-6.50 → -4.40
Residual
+0.6%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.