StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OLI.AX$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

OLI.AX

Oliver's Real Food Limited

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsASX

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.4M · quality 50.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · OLI.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Oliver's Real Food Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

24.6x

↑

ROE

13.1%

↑

Gross Margin

62.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

-1.56

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

OLI.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.006Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $0.006

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.4%

FCF / Net income

0.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $26.4M · net income $-2.3M · FCF $-1.4M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

62.8%+6.5% pts

Operating margin

-2.5%+31.4% pts

Net margin

-8.8%+6.9% pts

FCF margin

-5.4%+4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$26.4M$26.4M$24.5M$19.1M$28.1M
Net Income$-2.3M$-2.3M$5.9M$-10.4M$-4.4M
EBITDA$1.2M$1.2M$8.8M$-6.1M$2.4M
EPS-0.01-0.010.01-0.03-0.02
Gross Margin62.8%62.8%62.2%53.2%56.2%
Operating Margin-2.5%-2.5%-0.1%-29.4%-33.9%
Net Margin-8.8%-8.8%24.1%-54.6%-15.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.56-1.56-1.35-1.41-5.39
Current Ratio0.160.16———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.4M$-1.4M$944077.00$-2.3M$-2.6M
Returns
ROE13.1%13.1%-38.5%47.5%72.9%
Valuation
P/E——1.34——
EV/EBITDA24.6324.633.22—19.76
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.8%7.8%28.1%-32.0%—
EPS Growth-138.8%-138.8%146.4%-87.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +50.0%

Total return

+50.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → -0.01

Residual

+50.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+50.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.