Technology / Software - ApplicationNYSE
$17.62
-0.52 (-2.87%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 24% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $20.2M · quality 49.3/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
40/100
C
Piotroski
6/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$484M
P/E
53.4x
↑EV/EBITDA
29.5x
↑ROE
7.0%
↑Gross Margin
61.1%
↑Debt/Equity
0.79
↑TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2014–2026 · 12 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
+14.5%
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
8.1%
FCF / Net income
3.42x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $273.6M · net income $6.5M · FCF $22.1M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2026 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $273.6M | $273.6M | $256.9M | $236.7M | $216.2M | — | — | — | — | $114.5M | $104.5M | $88.8M | $72.2M | $53.7M |
| Net Income | $6.5M | $6.5M | $-6.9M | $-835000.00 | $-3.7M | $-1.8M | $-2.4M | $-18.8M | $-14.6M | $-13.1M | $-12.9M | $-14.1M | $-6.4M | $-2.0M |
| EBITDA | $18.6M | $18.6M | $6.2M | $7.0M | $3.3M | $1.2M | $102000.00 | $-17.2M | $-13.5M | $-11.8M | $-11.6M | $-11.3M | $-4.8M | $-668000.00 |
| EPS | 0.23 | 0.23 | -0.26 | -0.03 | -0.15 | -0.07 | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 61.1% | 60.7% | 62.2% | 63.7% | — | — | — | — | 59.5% | 56.8% | 52.8% | 49.1% | 41.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 1.6% | -2.7% | -1.7% | -2.7% | — | — | — | — | -12.0% | -12.7% | -14.3% | -7.9% | -2.7% |
| Net Margin | 2.4% | 2.4% | -2.7% | -0.4% | -1.7% | — | — | — | — | -11.5% | -12.4% | -15.8% | -8.9% | -3.7% |
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current Ratio | 0.94 | 0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $22.1M | $22.1M | $20.2M | $6.1M | $3.6M | $2.5M | $1.2M | $-10.8M | $-5.8M | $695000.00 | $-1.2M | — | — | — |
| Returns | ||||||||||||||
| ROE | 7.0% | 7.0% | -8.1% | -1.1% | -5.8% | -3.4% | -6.2% | -66.2% | -44.1% | -35.4% | -32.5% | -32.8% | 14.2% | 5.0% |
| Valuation | ||||||||||||||
| P/E | 53.39 | 53.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 29.52 | 29.52 | 62.06 | 38.99 | 110.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 5.33 | 5.33 | 4.53 | 3.29 | 5.89 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | 6.5% | 6.5% | 8.5% | 9.5% | — | — | — | — | — | 9.5% | 17.7% | 23.0% | 34.5% | — |
| EPS Growth | 188.5% | 188.5% | -766.7% | 80.0% | — | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
3Y implied EPS CAGR
89.4%
EPS terminal req.
$1.56
Spread vs growth
99.0%
5Y implied EPS CAGR
52.4%
EPS terminal req.
$1.89
Spread vs growth
136.0%
10Y implied EPS CAGR
29.5%
EPS terminal req.
$3.05
Spread vs growth
159.0%
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+34.3%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.26 → 0.23
Residual
+34.3%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.