StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OSX.AX$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

OSX.AX

Osteopore Limited

Healthcare / Medical Instruments & SuppliesASX

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.1M · quality 73.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · OSX.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Osteopore Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

215.6%

↑

Gross Margin

77.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

-1.62

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

OSX.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.006Periodo -99.9%
Fair value: $0.006

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+21.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-83.5%

FCF / Net income

0.69x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.1M · net income $-3.7M · FCF $-2.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

77.5%+2.3% pts

Operating margin

-111.6%+153.2% pts

Net margin

-121.8%+126.1% pts

FCF margin

-83.5%+153.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.1M$3.1M$2.9M$2.2M$1.7M
Net Income$-3.7M$-3.7M$-3.4M$-4.9M$-4.2M
EBITDA$-2.9M$-2.9M$-2.4M$-4.3M$-4.0M
EPS——-0.03-0.08-0.09
Gross Margin77.5%77.5%84.0%73.8%75.2%
Operating Margin-111.6%-111.6%-99.8%-225.7%-264.8%
Net Margin-121.8%-121.8%-115.1%-219.7%-247.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.62-1.624.352.760.04
Current Ratio0.850.85———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.6M$-2.6M$-3.1M$-3.7M$-4.0M
Returns
ROE215.6%215.6%-1094.8%-1126.2%-199.1%
Valuation
P/B——12.8992.1444.35
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.0%5.0%31.3%31.0%—
EPS Growth——64.4%6.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -60.0%

Total return

-60.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → n/d

Residual

-60.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-60.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.