StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OWLS$5.83+0.52%
Fair $5.83+0.0%

OWLS

Obook Holdings Inc.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureNasdaqGM

$5.83

+0.03 (+0.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5.83Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.5M · quality 76.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · OWLSLocal privado en este navegador · Obook Holdings Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$515M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

890.1%

↑

Gross Margin

2.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

-1.33

↓
52-Week Range$6
$5$90

TradingView lightweight chart

OWLS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.830Periodo -89.5%
Fair value: $5.830

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+27.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-155.4%

FCF / Net income

0.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $7.9M · net income $-31.9M · FCF $-12.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

2.6%-5.0% pts

Operating margin

-409.8%-197.1% pts

Net margin

-405.2%-165.0% pts

FCF margin

-155.4%+62.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$7.9M$7.9M$7.6M$6.4M$3.8M
Net Income$-31.9M$-31.9M$-10.3M$-6.7M$-9.1M
EBITDA$-30.0M$-30.0M$-8.8M$-5.7M$-7.9M
EPS-0.39-0.39-0.14-0.09-0.12
Gross Margin2.6%2.6%13.3%19.8%7.6%
Operating Margin-409.8%-409.8%-117.8%-105.9%-212.7%
Net Margin-405.2%-405.2%-135.7%-105.5%-240.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.33-1.33-1.42-0.25-0.26
Current Ratio0.740.74———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-12.2M$-12.2M$-9.5M$-5.6M$-8.2M
Returns
ROE890.1%890.1%238.9%105.7%97.5%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.9%3.9%18.3%69.7%—
EPS Growth-182.4%-182.4%-52.2%25.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -89.5%

Total return

-89.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.14 → -0.39

Residual

-89.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-89.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.