StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
OXYGENTAPH.BO$49.46-0.28%
Fair $49.46+0.0%

OXYGENTAPH.BO

Oxygenta Pharmaceutical Limited

Healthcare / Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBSE

$49.46

-0.15 (-0.28%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $49.46Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-171.6M · quality 75.3/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · OXYGENTAPH.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Oxygenta Pharmaceutical Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.8B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

41.2%

↑

Gross Margin

9.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

-2.57

↓
52-Week Range$49
$45$134

TradingView lightweight chart

OXYGENTAPH.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $52.55Periodo +951.0%
Fair value: $49.46

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+53.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-35.9%

FCF / Net income

2.31x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.13B · net income $-175.7M · FCF $-406.1M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

9.6%+8.3% pts

Operating margin

-15.7%+13.9% pts

Net margin

-15.6%+21.8% pts

FCF margin

-35.9%+0.5% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.13B$1.13B$1.09B$396.4M$309.9M
Net Income$-175.7M$-175.7M$-103.0M$-34.8M$-115.7M
EBITDA$-150.8M$-150.8M$-87.8M$-96.3M$-78.5M
EPS——-2.86-1.09-8.15
Gross Margin9.6%9.6%11.7%-3.3%1.3%
Operating Margin-15.7%-15.7%-12.5%-31.1%-29.5%
Net Margin-15.6%-15.6%-9.4%-8.8%-37.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.57-2.57-2.49-2.84-1.47
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-406.1M$-406.1M$-85.6M$-171.6M$-112.8M
Returns
ROE41.2%41.2%41.2%17.3%25.0%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.4%3.4%175.7%27.9%—
EPS Growth——-162.4%86.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -43.4%

Total return

-43.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-2.86 → n/d

Residual

-43.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-43.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.