StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
P1E.AX$0.06-1.64%
Fair $0.06+0.0%

P1E.AX

Pure One Corporation Limited

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PASX

$0.06

-0.00 (-1.64%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.06Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 15/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.6M · quality 52.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

15/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · P1E.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Pure One Corporation Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$23M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-121.1%

↓

Gross Margin

5.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

P1E.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.060Periodo -82.9%
Fair value: $0.060

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-147.5%

FCF / Net income

0.22x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.4M · net income $-16.0M · FCF $-3.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

5.1%— pts

Operating margin

-180.4%— pts

Net margin

-665.0%— pts

FCF margin

-147.5%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.4M$2.4M$1.0M$36000.00—
Net Income$-16.0M$-16.0M$-3.9M$1.4M$-2.5M
EBITDA$-4.3M$-4.3M$-5.5M$-4.2M$-2.2M
EPS——-0.010.00-0.01
Gross Margin5.1%5.1%13.8%100.0%—
Operating Margin-180.4%-180.4%-572.2%-11555.6%—
Net Margin-665.0%-665.0%-380.1%3919.4%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.02———
Current Ratio1.231.23———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.5M$-3.5M$-2.6M$2.3M$-2.4M
Returns
ROE-121.1%-121.1%-13.9%4.6%-8.9%
Valuation
P/E———50.00—
P/B1.701.702.412.293.42
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth133.1%133.1%2763.9%——
EPS Growth——-375.0%153.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -23.1%

Total return

-23.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

-23.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-23.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.