StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PADEL.ST$3.70+0.95%
Fair $3.70+0.0%

PADEL.ST

Acenta Group AB

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionStockholm

$3.70

+0.03 (+0.95%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.70Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 10/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.3M · quality 66.7/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 46/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

10/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -3.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PADEL.STLocal privado en este navegador · Acenta Group AB
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-378.2%

↓

Gross Margin

99.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$4
$3$23

TradingView lightweight chart

PADEL.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.180Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $3.700

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2022 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+203.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-855.6%

FCF / Net income

0.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.1M · net income $-38.5M · FCF $-9.3M

2021-FY → 2022-FY

Gross margin

99.1%-0.9% pts

Operating margin

-3089.7%-534.6% pts

Net margin

-3536.4%-869.0% pts

FCF margin

-855.6%+1719.7% pts
MetricTTM
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$1.1M$1.1M$359000.00
Net Income$-38.5M$-38.5M$-9.6M
EBITDA$-14.2M$-14.2M$-6.4M
EPS-1399.87-1399.87-580.14
Gross Margin99.1%99.1%100.0%
Operating Margin-3089.7%-3089.7%-2555.2%
Net Margin-3536.4%-3536.4%-2667.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.03
Current Ratio0.550.55—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.3M$-9.3M$-9.2M
Returns
ROE-378.2%-378.2%-32.4%
Valuation
P/B0.010.010.89
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth203.3%203.3%—
EPS Growth-141.3%-141.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -66.5%

Total return

-66.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-580.14 → -1399.87

Residual

-66.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-66.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.