Industrials / Marine ShippingNasdaqCM
$7.64
+0.07 (+0.92%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 32% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $26.5M · quality 59.3/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
45/100
C
Piotroski
5/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$500M
P/E
14.1x
↓EV/EBITDA
6.3x
↓ROE
4.5%
↓Gross Margin
10.9%
↓Debt/Equity
0.36
↑TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2013–2025 · 12 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
+4.1%
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
7.5%
FCF / Net income
2.44x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $632.0M · net income $19.4M · FCF $47.2M
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $632.0M | $632.0M | $536.5M | $499.3M | $699.7M | $718.1M | $382.9M | $412.2M | $373.0M | $385.9M | $238.0M | $287.3M | $398.3M | $392.5M |
| Net Income | $19.4M | $19.4M | $28.9M | $26.3M | $79.5M | $67.2M | $11.4M | $11.7M | $17.8M | $7.8M | $7.5M | $11.3M | $-12.1M | $15.5M |
| EBITDA | $86.6M | $86.6M | $82.3M | $76.1M | $137.4M | $101.8M | $36.8M | $41.8M | $53.7M | $31.6M | $27.0M | $33.3M | $9.2M | $31.0M |
| EPS | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 1.76 | 1.50 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 0.21 | 0.32 | -1.61 | -0.65 |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 10.9% | 13.6% | 13.8% | 18.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 6.0% | 9.0% | 9.3% | 15.6% | 11.0% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 9.7% | 4.2% | 5.4% | 7.1% | -0.6% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | 3.1% | 3.1% | 5.4% | 5.3% | 11.4% | 9.4% | 3.0% | 2.8% | 4.8% | 2.0% | 3.1% | 3.9% | -3.0% | 3.9% |
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.95 | — | — | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 1.11 | 1.40 | 1.09 | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.63 | 1.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $47.2M | $47.2M | $-3.7M | $26.5M | $98.4M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Returns | ||||||||||||||
| ROE | 4.5% | 4.5% | 6.8% | 8.1% | 25.3% | 27.2% | 6.2% | 6.8% | 11.0% | 5.4% | 6.4% | 10.4% | -12.4% | -264.3% |
| Valuation | ||||||||||||||
| P/E | 14.15 | 14.15 | 8.89 | 14.05 | 3.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.27 | 6.27 | 4.12 | 7.04 | 3.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.60 | 1.14 | 0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | ||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | 17.8% | 17.8% | 7.5% | -28.6% | — | 87.5% | -7.1% | 10.5% | -3.4% | 62.2% | -17.2% | -27.9% | 1.5% | — |
| EPS Growth | -52.4% | -52.4% | 8.6% | -67.0% | — | 476.9% | -3.7% | -35.7% | 110.0% | -4.8% | -34.4% | 119.9% | -147.7% | — |
| Dividend Yield | 2.6% | 2.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
3Y implied EPS CAGR
31.2%
EPS terminal req.
$0.68
Spread vs growth
-83.6%
5Y implied EPS CAGR
22.3%
EPS terminal req.
$0.82
Spread vs growth
-74.7%
10Y implied EPS CAGR
16.0%
EPS terminal req.
$1.32
Spread vs growth
-68.4%
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+72.4%
Start / end P/E
7.1x → 25.5x
EPS bridge
0.63 → 0.30
Residual
-134.4%
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.