StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PANR.L$13.60-7.80%
Fair $13.60+0.0%

PANR.L

Pantheon Resources Plc

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PLSE

$13.60

-1.15 (-7.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.60Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-44.8M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PANR.LLocal privado en este navegador · Pantheon Resources Plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$198M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

129547.1x

↑

ROE

-1.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.09

↓
52-Week Range$14
$7$33

TradingView lightweight chart

PANR.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.60Periodo -88.0%
Fair value: $13.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

10.60x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-4.2M · FCF $-44.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$13393.00$803689.00—
Net Income$-4.2M$-4.2M$-13.4M$-1.4M$-14.0M
EBITDA$120110.00$120110.00$-8.4M$4.9M$-11.3M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.01-0.00-0.02
Gross Margin——46.6%16.2%—
Operating Margin——-65463.4%-856.9%—
Net Margin——-99812.1%-180.0%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.090.090.070.100.13
Current Ratio1.341.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-44.8M$-44.8M$-18.3M$-59.6M$-46.2M
Returns
ROE-1.3%-1.3%-4.8%-0.5%-5.8%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA129547.09129547.09—2011.14—
P/B49.6049.6076.8635.62305.26
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-98.3%——
EPS Growth69.6%69.6%-594.4%90.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -48.0%

Total return

-48.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.00

Residual

-48.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-48.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.