StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PESO.V$0.72+0.69%
Fair $0.72+0.0%

PESO.V

PesoRama Inc.

Consumer Defensive / Discount StoresTSXV

$0.72

+0.00 (+0.69%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.72Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.5M · quality 71.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PESO.VLocal privado en este navegador · PesoRama Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$151M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

112.9%

↑

Gross Margin

37.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.62

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

PESO.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.725Periodo +18.9%
Fair value: $0.725

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+35.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-27.9%

FCF / Net income

0.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $23.4M · net income $-10.1M · FCF $-6.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

37.5%+21.1% pts

Operating margin

-24.1%+72.9% pts

Net margin

-43.2%+75.2% pts

FCF margin

-27.9%+21.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$23.4M$23.4M$20.5M$14.5M$9.4M
Net Income$-10.1M$-10.1M$-10.6M$-11.9M$-11.1M
EBITDA$-4.4M$-4.4M$-5.9M$-7.9M$-6.7M
EPS-0.11-0.11-0.11-0.16-0.15
Gross Margin37.5%37.5%34.1%33.4%16.4%
Operating Margin-24.1%-24.1%-41.3%-51.1%-96.9%
Net Margin-43.2%-43.2%-51.8%-82.2%-118.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.62-2.625.400.61-2.27
Current Ratio0.420.42———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.5M$-6.5M$-4.5M$-8.6M$-4.6M
Returns
ROE112.9%112.9%-511.5%-136.7%232.7%
Valuation
P/B——6.721.34—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth14.3%14.3%41.3%55.4%—
EPS Growth0.0%0.0%31.3%-3.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +326.5%

Total return

+326.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.11 → -0.11

Residual

+326.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+326.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.