StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PEVE.JK$312.00+4.00%
Fair $312.00+0.0%

PEVE.JK

PT. Penta Valent Tbk

Healthcare / Pharmaceutical RetailersJakartaID

$312.00

+12.00 (+4.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $312.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-105.8B · quality 67.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: eodhdPeriods: 4Warnings: 0eodhd: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PEVE.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT. Penta Valent Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$550.9B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

16.0%

↑

Gross Margin

10.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$312
$254$740

TradingView lightweight chart

PEVE.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $312.00Periodo +56.0%
Fair value: $312.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3.7%

FCF / Net income

-2.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.55T · net income $55.33B · FCF $-131.51B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.6%-0.1% pts

Operating margin

2.5%+0.8% pts

Net margin

1.6%+0.5% pts

FCF margin

-3.7%-2.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3547.99B$3547.99B$3012.74B$2484.68B$2147.33B
Net Income$55.33B$55.33B$48.01B$36.17B$23.55B
EPS31.3431.3427.1920.4913.34
Gross Margin10.6%10.6%11.6%12.2%10.7%
Operating Margin2.5%2.5%2.2%2.0%1.6%
Net Margin1.6%1.6%1.6%1.5%1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.000.000.00
Current Ratio1.331.331.331.371.28
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-131.51B$-131.51B$-105.76B$-69.52B$-27.67B
Returns
ROE16.0%16.0%16.7%15.6%16.0%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.8%17.8%21.3%15.7%—
EPS Growth15.2%15.2%32.7%53.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-4.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$27.68

Spread vs growth

19.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

1.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$33.50

Spread vs growth

13.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

5.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$53.95

Spread vs growth

9.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -10.9%

Total return

-10.9%

Start / end P/E

12.9x → 10.0x

EPS bridge

27.19 → 31.34

Residual

-3.4%

EPS growth+15.2%
Multiple rerating-22.6%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.