StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PIERCE.ST$8.85-4.32%
Fair $8.85+0.0%

PIERCE.ST

Pierce Group AB (publ)

Consumer Cyclical / Auto PartsStockholm

$8.85

-0.40 (-4.32%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.85Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $99.0M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PIERCE.STLocal privado en este navegador · Pierce Group AB (publ)
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$702M

P/E

26.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.7x

↑

ROE

N/A

•

Gross Margin

42.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.18

↓
52-Week Range$9
$8$15

TradingView lightweight chart

PIERCE.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.850Periodo -84.9%
Fair value: $8.850

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.6%

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.82B · net income — · FCF $-10.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

42.6%+3.2% pts

Operating margin

1.6%+5.7% pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

-0.6%-0.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.82B$1.82B$1.63B$1.54B$1.67B
Net Income——$36.0M$-96.0M$-58.0M
EBITDA$60.0M$60.0M$112.0M$-34.0M$6.0M
EPS-0.01-0.010.45-1.21-0.98
Gross Margin42.6%42.6%44.5%39.5%39.3%
Operating Margin1.6%1.6%1.2%-7.3%-4.1%
Net Margin——2.2%-6.2%-3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.180.180.080.090.09
Current Ratio1.901.90———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-10.0M$-10.0M$99.0M$119.0M$-5.0M
Returns
ROE——5.4%-15.3%-8.1%
Valuation
P/E26.0326.0316.53——
EV/EBITDA9.749.743.09—77.88
P/B1.061.060.890.830.75
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.5%11.5%5.9%-8.0%—
EPS Growth-102.2%-102.2%137.2%-23.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +8.2%

Total return

+8.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.45 → -0.01

Residual

+8.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+8.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.