StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PIP.L$2.50+0.00%
Fair $2.50+0.0%

PIP.L

PipeHawk plc

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsLSE

$2.50

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.50Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $99000.00 · quality 45.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PIP.LLocal privado en este navegador · PipeHawk plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$907820

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

339.7x

↑

ROE

4.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

-1.11

↓
52-Week Range$3
$1$4

TradingView lightweight chart

PIP.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.500Periodo -95.0%
Fair value: $2.500

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-15.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.38x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.7M · net income $-259000.0 · FCF $99000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

3.2%+24.3% pts

Net margin

-6.9%+7.1% pts

FCF margin

2.6%+21.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.7M$3.7M$9.1M$6.5M$6.2M
Net Income$-259000.00$-259000.00$-821000.00$-2.5M$-868000.00
EBITDA$288000.00$288000.00$-596000.00$-2.3M$-888000.00
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.02-0.07-0.02
Operating Margin3.2%3.2%-11.5%-34.3%-21.2%
Net Margin-6.9%-6.9%-9.0%-38.4%-14.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.11-1.11-1.07-1.43-2.79
Current Ratio0.220.22———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$99000.00$99000.00$-280000.00$1.2M$-1.2M
Returns
ROE4.1%4.1%13.1%45.6%29.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA339.69339.69———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-59.0%-59.0%41.2%4.5%—
EPS Growth68.6%68.6%67.0%-182.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +100.0%

Total return

+100.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.01

Residual

+100.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+100.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.