StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PMT.MI$2.64+0.76%
Fair $2.64+0.0%

PMT.MI

Promotica S.p.A.

Industrials / Consulting ServicesMilan

$2.64

+0.02 (+0.76%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.64Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.8M · quality 33.7/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 5/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PMT.MILocal privado en este navegador · Promotica S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$45M

P/E

11.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

11.8x

↑

ROE

7.2%

↑

Gross Margin

31.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.05

↑
52-Week Range$3
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

PMT.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.640Periodo +53.4%
Fair value: $2.640

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+34.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

7.0%

FCF / Net income

4.06x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $96.0M · net income $1.7M · FCF $6.7M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

31.9%+3.4% pts

Operating margin

3.5%-0.4% pts

Net margin

1.7%-1.8% pts

FCF margin

7.0%+22.8% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$96.0M$96.0M$84.5M$89.9M$39.6M
Net Income$1.7M$1.7M$3.3M$3.2M$1.4M
EBITDA$5.4M$5.4M$7.7M$5.5M$2.3M
EPS——0.190.190.09
Gross Margin31.9%31.9%32.3%28.8%28.5%
Operating Margin3.5%3.5%7.4%4.0%3.9%
Net Margin1.7%1.7%3.9%3.5%3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.051.051.501.211.19
Current Ratio1.611.61———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$6.7M$6.7M$-5.8M$-8.7M$-6.2M
Returns
ROE7.2%7.2%15.3%17.6%11.2%
Valuation
P/E11.4811.4812.7915.9238.28
EV/EBITDA11.8311.838.7312.3527.74
P/B1.941.941.952.804.29
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.7%13.7%-6.0%127.1%—
EPS Growth——3.2%118.6%—
Dividend Yield5.7%5.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +25.7%

Total return

+25.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.19 → n/d

Residual

+20.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+20.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.