StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PROK$1.85+1.09%
Fair $1.85+0.0%

PROK

ProKidney Corp.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$1.85

+0.02 (+1.09%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.85Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-135.3M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 6Warnings: 0unknown: 6
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · PROKLocal privado en este navegador · ProKidney Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$559M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

6.8%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

-0.00

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$7

TradingView lightweight chart

PROK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.850Periodo -81.7%
Fair value: $1.850

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2020–2025 · 5 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15152.6%

FCF / Net income

1.96x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $893000.0 · net income $-69.0M · FCF $-135.3M

2020-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-18477.8%— pts

Net margin

-7725.2%— pts

FCF margin

-15152.6%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
Income Statement
Revenue$893000.00$893000.00$76000.00————
Net Income$-69.0M$-69.0M$-61.2M$-35.5M$-108.0M$-55.1M$-26.7M
EBITDA$-144.6M$-144.6M$-158.5M$-125.6M$-144.0M$-53.1M$-26.1M
EPS-0.52-0.52-0.62-0.57-0.23——
Operating Margin-18477.8%-18477.8%-241678.9%————
Net Margin-7725.2%-7725.2%-80507.9%————
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00——
Current Ratio9.069.06—————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-135.3M$-135.3M$-155.9M$-124.3M$-78.9M$-55.5M$-30.6M
Returns
ROE6.8%6.8%6.1%3.2%9.9%-204.9%-271.2%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1075.0%1075.0%—————
EPS Growth16.1%16.1%-8.8%-147.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +155.9%

Total return

+155.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.62 → -0.52

Residual

+155.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+155.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.