StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PRQR$1.42-10.13%
Fair $1.42+0.0%

PRQR

ProQR Therapeutics N.V.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqCM

$1.42

-0.16 (-10.13%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.42Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-37.8M · quality 50.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -85.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PRQRLocal privado en este navegador · ProQR Therapeutics N.V.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$150M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-85.4%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.32

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

PRQR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.420Periodo -90.4%
Fair value: $1.420

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+64.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-338.3%

FCF / Net income

1.28x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.9M · net income $-42.2M · FCF $-53.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-273.1%+1539.9% pts

Net margin

-265.2%+1527.3% pts

FCF margin

-338.3%+1587.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$15.9M$15.9M$18.9M$6.5M$3.6M
Net Income$-42.2M$-42.2M$-27.8M$-28.1M$-64.4M
EBITDA$-38.5M$-38.5M$-24.1M$-24.1M$-56.5M
EPS——-0.32-0.35-0.90
Operating Margin-273.1%-273.1%-161.2%-534.1%-1813.0%
Net Margin-265.2%-265.2%-146.9%-431.7%-1792.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.320.320.190.480.33
Current Ratio2.482.48———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-53.8M$-53.8M$-37.8M$20.2M$-69.2M
Returns
ROE-85.4%-85.4%-31.3%-67.9%-96.1%
Valuation
P/B3.033.032.683.963.81
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-15.9%-15.9%190.2%81.2%—
EPS Growth——8.6%61.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.5%

Total return

-14.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.32 → n/d

Residual

-14.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.