StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PSE.OL$6.10-3.31%
Fair $6.10+0.0%

PSE.OL

Petrolia SE

Energy / Oil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOslo

$6.10

-0.20 (-3.31%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6.10Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $6.5M · quality 80.3/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 82/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · PSE.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Petrolia SE
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$360M

P/E

7.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

24.2x

↑

ROE

11.3%

↑

Gross Margin

57.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.30

↓
52-Week Range$6
$4$7

TradingView lightweight chart

PSE.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5.850Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $6.100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.8%

FCF CAGR

+8.3%

FCF margin

10.2%

FCF / Net income

1.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $60.4M · net income $5.4M · FCF $6.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

57.8%-1.7% pts

Operating margin

5.2%-5.8% pts

Net margin

9.0%+11.9% pts

FCF margin

10.2%+1.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$60.4M$60.4M$53.5M$54.2M$55.5M
Net Income$5.4M$5.4M$4.0M$2.0M$-1.6M
EBITDA$14.8M$14.8M$12.0M$10.7M$8.6M
EPS——0.070.03-0.03
Gross Margin57.8%57.8%65.8%61.5%59.5%
Operating Margin5.2%5.2%12.0%8.9%11.0%
Net Margin9.0%9.0%7.4%3.7%-2.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.300.300.270.390.42
Current Ratio2.572.57———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$6.1M$6.1M$6.8M$6.5M$4.8M
Returns
ROE11.3%11.3%9.7%5.2%-4.3%
Valuation
P/E7.267.2667.43137.67—
EV/EBITDA24.1924.1923.0923.2129.05
P/B7.457.456.836.356.74
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.9%12.9%-1.3%-2.4%—
EPS Growth——133.3%200.0%—
Dividend Yield3.2%3.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +46.2%

Total return

+46.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.07 → n/d

Residual

+43.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+43.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.