StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PTW.WA$123.00+0.39%
Fair $123.00+0.0%

PTW.WA

PTW.WA

Communication Services / PublishingWarsaw

$123.00

+0.50 (+0.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $123.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.0M · quality 66.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 54/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PTW.WALocal privado en este navegador · PTW.WA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$198M

P/E

8.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.4x

↓

ROE

24.8%

↑

Gross Margin

92.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$123
$81$155

TradingView lightweight chart

PTW.WA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $127.50Periodo +235.5%
Fair value: $123.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+16.2%

FCF CAGR

+43.7%

FCF margin

16.1%

FCF / Net income

1.12x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $132.5M · net income $19.1M · FCF $21.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

92.4%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

18.3%+7.6% pts

Net margin

14.4%+5.0% pts

FCF margin

16.1%+7.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$132.5M$132.5M$103.0M$84.9M$84.4M
Net Income$19.1M$19.1M$3.3M$4.0M$8.0M
EBITDA$27.4M$27.4M$9.8M$8.5M$11.3M
EPS——2.663.236.46
Gross Margin92.4%92.4%89.2%88.8%92.1%
Operating Margin18.3%18.3%7.1%7.3%10.7%
Net Margin14.4%14.4%3.2%4.7%9.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.080.010.02
Current Ratio1.361.36———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$21.4M$21.4M$4.0M$2.0M$7.2M
Returns
ROE24.8%24.8%15.2%16.7%29.3%
Valuation
P/E8.048.0419.7418.116.47
EV/EBITDA4.374.374.365.641.99
P/B1.981.983.003.021.90
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth28.6%28.6%21.4%0.6%—
EPS Growth——-17.6%-50.0%—
Dividend Yield5.7%5.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +59.3%

Total return

+59.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

2.66 → n/d

Residual

+53.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+53.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.