StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PUL.V$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

PUL.V

Pulse Oil Corp.

Energy / Oil & Gas E&PTSXV

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.2M · quality 72.3/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 68/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -9.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · PUL.VLocal privado en este navegador · Pulse Oil Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$9M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-9.7%

↓

Gross Margin

33.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.15

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

PUL.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.015Periodo -84.0%
Fair value: $0.015

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-14.1%

FCF CAGR

-10.8%

FCF margin

27.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.8M · net income $-2.2M · FCF $1.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.4%-39.6% pts

Operating margin

-30.5%-52.7% pts

Net margin

-57.4%-84.0% pts

FCF margin

27.6%+3.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.8M$3.8M$5.4M$4.3M$5.9M
Net Income$-2.2M$-2.2M$-4.3M$-1.7M$1.6M
EBITDA$-42408.00$-42408.00$-2.4M$-36169.00$2.8M
EPS——-0.01—0.00
Gross Margin33.4%33.4%53.2%31.4%73.0%
Operating Margin-30.5%-30.5%3.5%-16.4%22.2%
Net Margin-57.4%-57.4%-79.6%-39.9%26.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.150.15—0.000.00
Current Ratio0.310.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.0M$1.0M$2.0M$1.2M$1.5M
Returns
ROE-9.7%-9.7%-17.5%-6.9%6.0%
Valuation
P/E————30.53
EV/EBITDA————15.78
P/B0.420.420.510.841.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-30.1%-30.1%26.3%-28.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +50.0%

Total return

+50.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+50.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+50.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.