StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
PWS.MI$20.00+0.25%
Fair $20.00+0.0%

PWS.MI

Powersoft S.p.A.

Technology / Consumer ElectronicsMilan

$20.00

+0.05 (+0.25%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $20.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 63/B
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $3.6M · quality 57.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

63/100

B

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · PWS.MILocal privado en este navegador · Powersoft S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$257M

P/E

26.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

12.6x

↓

ROE

23.3%

↑

Gross Margin

53.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.56

↑
52-Week Range$20
$14$24

TradingView lightweight chart

PWS.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $20.00Periodo +449.5%
Fair value: $20.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+24.6%

FCF CAGR

+42.3%

FCF margin

18.6%

FCF / Net income

1.77x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $94.4M · net income $9.9M · FCF $17.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

53.7%+3.1% pts

Operating margin

19.6%-0.7% pts

Net margin

10.5%-2.5% pts

FCF margin

18.6%+6.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$94.4M$94.4M$72.4M$70.3M$48.8M
Net Income$9.9M$9.9M$12.3M$12.1M$6.3M
EBITDA$20.9M$20.9M$20.3M$19.2M$10.9M
EPS——1.020.990.53
Gross Margin53.7%53.7%50.6%48.7%50.6%
Operating Margin19.6%19.6%22.9%23.7%20.3%
Net Margin10.5%10.5%17.1%17.1%13.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.560.560.080.060.04
Current Ratio2.712.71———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.5M$17.5M$638988.00$3.6M$6.1M
Returns
ROE23.3%23.3%32.0%35.1%20.4%
Valuation
P/E25.9725.9713.9211.019.53
EV/EBITDA12.6212.628.286.293.76
P/B6.036.034.473.871.93
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth30.4%30.4%2.9%44.2%—
EPS Growth——3.0%86.8%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.9%

Total return

+16.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.02 → n/d

Residual

+13.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+13.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.