StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
QSE.CN$0.53-5.36%
Fair $0.53+0.0%

QSE.CN

Quantum Secure Encryption Corp.

Technology / Software - ApplicationCanadian Sec

$0.53

-0.03 (-5.36%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.53Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.1M · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -1.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · QSE.CNLocal privado en este navegador · Quantum Secure Encryption Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$36M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-160.2%

↓

Gross Margin

51.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

QSE.CN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.530Periodo +211.8%
Fair value: $0.530

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-8040.8%

FCF / Net income

0.89x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $40883.0 · net income $-3.7M · FCF $-3.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

51.7%— pts

Operating margin

-8807.5%— pts

Net margin

-9081.3%— pts

FCF margin

-8040.8%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$40883.00$40883.00———
Net Income$-3.7M$-3.7M$-11.4M$-3.2M$-369065.00
EBITDA$-3.7M$-3.7M$-11.4M$-3.2M$-369065.00
EPS-0.07-0.07-0.26-0.09-0.02
Gross Margin51.7%51.7%———
Operating Margin-8807.5%-8807.5%———
Net Margin-9081.3%-9081.3%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.02———
Current Ratio8.598.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.3M$-3.3M$-3.1M$-862671.00$-253531.00
Returns
ROE-160.2%-160.2%-860.8%1512.6%-34.0%
Valuation
P/B12.3312.3349.36—19.36
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth73.1%73.1%-188.9%-350.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +23.3%

Total return

+23.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.26 → -0.07

Residual

+23.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+23.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.