StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
QUBE.L$23.00+0.00%
Fair $23.00+0.0%

QUBE.L

Quantum Base Holdings PLC

Industrials / Security & Protection ServicesLSE

$23.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $23.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.1M · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -1.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · QUBE.LLocal privado en este navegador · Quantum Base Holdings PLC
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$19M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-120.4%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$23
$14$28

TradingView lightweight chart

QUBE.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $23.00Periodo -4.2%
Fair value: $23.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-17616.7%

FCF / Net income

0.66x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18000.0 · net income $-4.8M · FCF $-3.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-28427.8%— pts

Net margin

-26888.9%— pts

FCF margin

-17616.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$18000.00$18000.00———
Net Income$-4.8M$-4.8M$-1.3M$-434000.00$-285000.00
EBITDA$-4.9M$-4.9M$-1.4M$-473000.00$-273000.00
EPS-0.13-0.13-0.02-0.01-0.00
Operating Margin-28427.8%-28427.8%———
Net Margin-26888.9%-26888.9%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.010.010.01
Current Ratio1.941.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.2M$-3.2M$-1.1M$-578000.00$-220000.00
Returns
ROE-120.4%-120.4%-154.8%-33.2%-34.3%
Valuation
P/B209.90209.90———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth-565.4%-565.4%-188.5%-52.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -4.2%

Total return

-4.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.02 → -0.13

Residual

-4.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-4.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.