StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RAVALSUGAR.BO$988.00-0.01%
Fair $988.00+0.0%

RAVALSUGAR.BO

The Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Limited

Consumer Defensive / ConfectionersBSE

$988.00

-0.10 (-0.01%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $988.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 19/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-60.1M · quality 48.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

19/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -47.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RAVALSUGAR.BOLocal privado en este navegador · The Ravalgaon Sugar Farm Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$336M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-47.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.25

↓
52-Week Range$988
$812$1239

TradingView lightweight chart

RAVALSUGAR.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $988.00Periodo -30.7%
Fair value: $988.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-48.7M · FCF $-24.6M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue——$11.6M$85.8M$96.7M
Net Income$-48.7M$-48.7M$-20.3M$173.1M$-25.6M
EBITDA$-20.6M$-20.6M$-15.6M$234.1M$-9.8M
EPS——-59.62509.06-376.30
Gross Margin——10.3%30.0%34.8%
Operating Margin——-227.8%-33.0%-21.9%
Net Margin——-175.0%201.7%-26.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.250.25—0.12-41.43
Current Ratio0.370.37———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-24.6M$-24.6M$-63.0M$-60.1M$-9.0M
Returns
ROE-47.8%-47.8%-13.4%101.2%883.9%
Valuation
P/B3.303.302.50——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-86.5%-11.2%—
EPS Growth——-111.7%235.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -10.4%

Total return

-10.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-59.62 → n/d

Residual

-10.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-10.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.