StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RDT.L$1.80-2.70%
Fair $1.80+0.0%

RDT.L

Rosslyn Data Technologies plc

Technology / Software - ApplicationLSE

$1.80

-0.05 (-2.70%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.80Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 12/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.2M · quality 83.7/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 55/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

12/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -2.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RDT.LLocal privado en este navegador · Rosslyn Data Technologies plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-267.6%

↓

Gross Margin

38.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.26

↑
52-Week Range$2
$2$5

TradingView lightweight chart

RDT.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.800Periodo -99.9%
Fair value: $1.800

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-101.2%

FCF / Net income

0.86x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.9M · net income $-3.4M · FCF $-2.9M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

38.8%+22.2% pts

Operating margin

-124.1%+22.7% pts

Net margin

-117.7%+5.4% pts

FCF margin

-101.2%+17.9% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.9M$2.9M$3.0M$2.7M
Net Income$-3.4M$-3.4M$372000.00$-3.4M
EBITDA$-3.1M$-3.1M$-2.4M$-4.0M
EPS-0.25-0.250.06-0.49
Gross Margin38.8%38.8%34.7%16.6%
Operating Margin-124.1%-124.1%-91.7%-146.9%
Net Margin-117.7%-117.7%12.4%-123.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.260.260.05—
Current Ratio0.680.68——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.9M$-2.9M$-3.2M$-3.3M
Returns
ROE-267.6%-267.6%19.5%-236.4%
Valuation
P/E——656.78—
P/B19.9419.94142.71609.46
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.2%-5.2%10.3%—
EPS Growth-525.4%-525.4%112.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -48.6%

Total return

-48.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → -0.25

Residual

-48.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-48.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.