StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RDZN$1.94+3.19%
Fair $1.94+0.0%

RDZN

Roadzen, Inc.

Technology / Software - ApplicationNasdaqGM

$1.94

+0.06 (+3.19%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.94Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-18.6M · quality 76.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 41/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 1unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RDZNLocal privado en este navegador · Roadzen, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$164M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

290.6%

↑

Gross Margin

57.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

-0.95

↓
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

RDZN price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.940Periodo -80.3%
Fair value: $1.940

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-41.9%

FCF / Net income

0.25x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $44.3M · net income $-72.9M · FCF $-18.6M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

57.5%— pts

Operating margin

-137.3%— pts

Net margin

-164.5%— pts

FCF margin

-41.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$44.3M$44.3M$46.7M$13.6M$10.0M—
Net Income$-72.9M$-72.9M$-99.7M$-14.0M$-9.7M—
EBITDA$-67.8M$-67.8M$-95.4M$-11.8M$-4.9M—
EPS-1.04-1.04-2.26-0.20-0.14—
Gross Margin57.5%57.5%61.2%60.1%51.9%—
Operating Margin-137.3%-137.3%-166.2%-85.0%-62.5%—
Net Margin-164.5%-164.5%-213.3%-103.4%-97.5%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.95-0.95-1.99-0.18-0.64—
Current Ratio0.540.54————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-18.6M$-18.6M$-19.7M$-8.4M$-5.1M—
Returns
ROE290.6%290.6%989.4%27.6%26.4%—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.2%-5.2%244.6%35.8%——
EPS Growth54.0%54.0%-1002.9%-44.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +97.2%

Total return

+97.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-2.26 → -1.04

Residual

+97.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+97.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.