StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
REDS.ST$3.86-6.54%
Fair $3.86+0.0%

REDS.ST

REDS.ST

Healthcare / Medical DevicesStockholm

$3.86

-0.27 (-6.54%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.86Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 27/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-8.0M · quality 55.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

27/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -20.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · REDS.STLocal privado en este navegador · REDS.ST
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$63M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-20.9%

↓

Gross Margin

64.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$4
$2$7

TradingView lightweight chart

REDS.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.860Periodo -66.8%
Fair value: $3.860

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-33.3%

FCF / Net income

1.12x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $24.0M · net income $-7.2M · FCF $-8.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

64.8%-13.8% pts

Operating margin

-30.7%+40.5% pts

Net margin

-29.9%+31.2% pts

FCF margin

-33.3%+52.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$24.0M$24.0M$28.2M$25.0M$14.3M
Net Income$-7.2M$-7.2M$342000.00$-4.5M$-8.8M
EBITDA$-6.5M$-6.5M$444000.00$-4.4M$-8.6M
EPS——0.02-0.32-0.62
Gross Margin64.8%64.8%64.2%52.6%78.5%
Operating Margin-30.7%-30.7%0.7%-20.3%-71.2%
Net Margin-29.9%-29.9%1.2%-18.1%-61.1%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio5.395.39———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-8.0M$-8.0M$-8.8M$-5.7M$-12.2M
Returns
ROE-20.9%-20.9%0.9%-19.5%-32.3%
Valuation
P/E——350.00——
EV/EBITDA——235.01——
P/B1.851.853.024.565.17
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-14.7%-14.7%12.9%74.1%—
EPS Growth——106.2%48.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -35.7%

Total return

-35.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-35.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-35.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.