StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RIC.AX$2.80+0.36%
Fair $2.80+0.0%

RIC.AX

Ridley Corporation Limited

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsASX

$2.80

+0.01 (+0.36%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.80Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $44.3M · quality 74.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 69/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · RIC.AXLocal privado en este navegador · Ridley Corporation Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

14.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↑

ROE

9.5%

↑

Gross Margin

9.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$3
$2$3

TradingView lightweight chart

RIC.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.800Periodo +305.8%
Fair value: $2.800

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.5%

FCF CAGR

+12.0%

FCF margin

2.5%

FCF / Net income

0.74x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.30B · net income $43.3M · FCF $32.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

9.3%-0.2% pts

Operating margin

2.2%-1.7% pts

Net margin

3.3%-0.7% pts

FCF margin

2.5%+0.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.30B$1.30B$1.26B$1.26B$1.05B
Net Income$43.3M$43.3M$39.9M$41.8M$42.4M
EBITDA$98.2M$98.2M$90.6M$88.5M$88.6M
EPS——0.120.130.13
Gross Margin9.3%9.3%9.2%8.8%9.5%
Operating Margin2.2%2.2%2.9%5.0%3.9%
Net Margin3.3%3.3%3.2%3.3%4.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.060.570.260.32
Current Ratio1.931.93———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$32.0M$32.0M$71.9M$44.3M$22.8M
Returns
ROE9.5%9.5%12.3%13.3%13.4%
Valuation
P/E14.0014.0016.5715.0813.74
EV/EBITDA10.1210.128.947.487.40
P/B2.292.292.041.981.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.1%3.1%0.2%20.1%—
EPS Growth——-6.9%2.3%—
Dividend Yield3.6%3.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.5%

Total return

+5.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.12 → n/d

Residual

+1.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.