StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RKT.AX$0.02+0.00%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

RKT.AX

RocketDNA Ltd.

Technology / Computer HardwareASX

$0.02

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.9M · quality 80.7/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 46/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -35.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RKT.AXLocal privado en este navegador · RocketDNA Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$29M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-35.8%

↓

Gross Margin

43.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.21

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

RKT.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.024Periodo +71.4%
Fair value: $0.024

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-46.1%

FCF / Net income

1.26x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $7.7M · net income $-2.8M · FCF $-3.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

43.9%-5.0% pts

Operating margin

-35.8%+6.1% pts

Net margin

-36.6%-3.1% pts

FCF margin

-46.1%-5.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$7.7M$7.7M$7.2M$6.1M$5.7M
Net Income$-2.8M$-2.8M$-1.9M$-1.8M$-1.9M
EBITDA$-2.0M$-2.0M$-1.0M$-1.4M$-2.0M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00
Gross Margin43.9%43.9%50.2%50.9%48.9%
Operating Margin-35.8%-35.8%-22.1%-27.6%-41.9%
Net Margin-36.6%-36.6%-26.6%-28.8%-33.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.210.210.220.240.07
Current Ratio2.592.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.5M$-3.5M$-1.7M$-1.9M$-2.3M
Returns
ROE-35.8%-35.8%-31.1%-35.9%-34.4%
Valuation
P/B2.882.881.320.95—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.1%6.1%18.0%7.0%—
EPS Growth-7.1%-7.1%17.6%10.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +118.2%

Total return

+118.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → -0.00

Residual

+118.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+118.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.