StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RVLY.V$0.01+0.00%
Fair $0.01+0.0%

RVLY.V

Rivalry Corp.

Consumer Cyclical / GamblingTSXV

$0.01

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.01Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 19/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-21.4M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

19/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · RVLY.VLocal privado en este navegador · Rivalry Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$436344

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

133.5%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

-0.73

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

RVLY.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.005Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $0.005

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-89.9%

FCF / Net income

0.54x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.6M · net income $-22.4M · FCF $-12.2M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-138.0%+68.2% pts

Net margin

-165.4%+54.0% pts

FCF margin

-89.9%+4.3% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$13.6M$13.6M$16.2M$9.8M$11.1M
Net Income$-22.4M$-22.4M$-23.8M$-31.1M$-24.3M
EBITDA$-20.0M$-20.0M$-24.3M$-30.9M$-24.1M
EPS-0.33-0.33-0.38-0.53-0.57
Gross Margin———100.0%19.7%
Operating Margin-138.0%-138.0%-139.1%-304.5%-206.2%
Net Margin-165.4%-165.4%-146.6%-317.3%-219.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-0.73-0.735.300.030.00
Current Ratio0.130.13———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-12.2M$-12.2M$-21.5M$-21.4M$-10.4M
Returns
ROE133.5%133.5%-1232.8%-211.7%-62.3%
Valuation
P/B——35.963.201.51
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-16.5%-16.5%65.6%-11.5%—
EPS Growth13.2%13.2%28.3%7.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -83.3%

Total return

-83.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.38 → -0.33

Residual

-83.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-83.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.