StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
RZR.TA$546.50+0.02%
Fair $546.50+0.0%

RZR.TA

Razor Labs

Technology / Software - InfrastructureTel Aviv

$546.50

+0.10 (+0.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $546.50Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-567000.00 · quality 49.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · RZR.TALocal privado en este navegador · Razor Labs
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$216M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

563.4%

↑

Gross Margin

45.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

-2.06

↓
52-Week Range$547
$304$769

TradingView lightweight chart

RZR.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $543.50Periodo -60.7%
Fair value: $546.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+88.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-49.3%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $34.6M · net income $-16.9M · FCF $-17.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

45.4%+14.2% pts

Operating margin

-43.4%+488.9% pts

Net margin

-48.8%+487.1% pts

FCF margin

-49.3%+417.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$34.6M$34.6M$17.2M$5.3M$5.1M
Net Income$-16.9M$-16.9M$-15.5M$-18.3M$-27.6M
EBITDA$-12.2M$-12.2M$-10.8M$-13.7M$-23.3M
EPS——-0.39-0.47-0.70
Gross Margin45.4%45.4%41.5%12.3%31.2%
Operating Margin-43.4%-43.4%-99.0%-338.3%-532.3%
Net Margin-48.8%-48.8%-89.9%-346.6%-535.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.06-2.061.640.810.54
Current Ratio1.581.58———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-17.1M$-17.1M$-567000.00$17.1M$-24.0M
Returns
ROE563.4%563.4%-138.9%-71.7%-64.4%
Valuation
P/B——1885.46238.5166.57
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth101.1%101.1%225.6%2.8%—
EPS Growth——17.0%32.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +22.3%

Total return

+22.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.39 → n/d

Residual

+22.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+22.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.