StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SAC.MI$1.27-1.57%
Fair $1.27+0.0%

SAC.MI

Saccheria F.lli Franceschetti S.p.A.

Consumer Cyclical / Packaging & ContainersMilan

$1.27

-0.02 (-1.57%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.27Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.2M · quality 49.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SAC.MILocal privado en este navegador · Saccheria F.lli Franceschetti S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$11M

P/E

9.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.3x

↓

ROE

10.6%

↑

Gross Margin

34.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.32

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

SAC.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.250Periodo -38.3%
Fair value: $1.270

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-5.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.7%

FCF / Net income

-1.18x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $19.8M · net income $1.1M · FCF $-1.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

34.7%-0.3% pts

Operating margin

9.6%+1.1% pts

Net margin

5.6%+0.3% pts

FCF margin

-6.7%-11.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$19.8M$19.8M$17.9M$18.0M$23.4M
Net Income$1.1M$1.1M$1.0M$1.1M$1.2M
EBITDA$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.3M$2.4M
EPS———0.130.14
Gross Margin34.7%34.7%36.6%37.4%35.0%
Operating Margin9.6%9.6%10.3%10.8%8.4%
Net Margin5.6%5.6%5.8%6.2%5.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.320.320.430.550.78
Current Ratio3.023.02———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.3M$-1.3M$1.2M$4.7M$1.1M
Returns
ROE10.6%10.6%10.4%11.9%14.0%
Valuation
P/E9.779.77—10.2614.53
EV/EBITDA6.306.305.125.349.57
P/B1.061.061.011.222.04
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.3%10.3%-0.7%-22.8%—
EPS Growth———-11.8%—
Dividend Yield2.4%2.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.0%

Total return

+16.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+13.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+13.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.