StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SACI.PA$26.60+0.00%
Fair $26.60+0.0%

SACI.PA

Fiducial Office Solutions

Industrials / Business Equipment & SuppliesParis

$26.60

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $26.60Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.2M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 1unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SACI.PALocal privado en este navegador · Fiducial Office Solutions
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$58M

P/E

31.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

6.5x

↓

ROE

2.4%

↓

Gross Margin

35.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$27
$26$27

TradingView lightweight chart

SACI.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $26.60Periodo -36.7%
Fair value: $26.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2022 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.3%

FCF / Net income

-7.12x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $215.0M · net income $1.9M · FCF $-13.4M

2021-FY → 2022-FY

Gross margin

35.0%-2.4% pts

Operating margin

1.0%-0.4% pts

Net margin

0.9%-0.4% pts

FCF margin

-6.3%-10.0% pts
MetricTTM
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$215.0M$215.0M$191.6M
Net Income$1.9M$1.9M$2.4M
EBITDA$9.9M$9.9M$10.7M
EPS——1.11
Gross Margin35.0%35.0%37.4%
Operating Margin1.0%1.0%1.3%
Net Margin0.9%0.9%1.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.27
Current Ratio1.431.43—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-13.4M$-13.4M$7.1M
Returns
ROE2.4%2.4%3.1%
Valuation
P/E31.6731.6724.50
EV/EBITDA6.536.537.32
P/B0.730.730.77
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth12.2%12.2%—
Dividend Yield2.6%2.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.9%

Total return

+1.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.11 → n/d

Residual

-0.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.