StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SBRANDS.BO$13.38-4.97%
Fair $13.38+0.0%

SBRANDS.BO

Sanghvi Brands Limited

Consumer Cyclical / Personal ServicesBSE

$13.38

-0.70 (-4.97%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.38Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $7.2M · quality 36.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 42/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SBRANDS.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Sanghvi Brands Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$139M

P/E

8.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.3x

↓

ROE

22.3%

↑

Gross Margin

92.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$13
$8$17

TradingView lightweight chart

SBRANDS.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.38Periodo -83.8%
Fair value: $13.38

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.6%

FCF CAGR

-10.0%

FCF margin

15.6%

FCF / Net income

1.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $146.1M · net income $15.8M · FCF $22.7M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

92.8%+2.7% pts

Operating margin

11.3%+10.7% pts

Net margin

10.8%+13.5% pts

FCF margin

15.6%-21.9% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$146.1M$146.1M$122.0M$91.3M$83.2M
Net Income$15.8M$15.8M$10.1M$5.0M$-2.2M
EBITDA$19.6M$19.6M$11.5M$6.6M$4.1M
EPS——0.970.48-0.21
Gross Margin92.8%92.8%95.0%29.2%90.1%
Operating Margin11.3%11.3%4.3%0.0%0.6%
Net Margin10.8%10.8%8.3%5.5%-2.7%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio2.332.33———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$22.7M$22.7M$7.2M$107220.00$31.2M
Returns
ROE22.3%22.3%18.3%11.2%-5.5%
Valuation
P/E8.808.808.6742.69—
EV/EBITDA4.344.343.2826.0853.59
P/B1.961.961.594.736.54
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth19.8%19.8%33.7%9.6%—
EPS Growth——102.1%328.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +21.2%

Total return

+21.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.97 → n/d

Residual

+21.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+21.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.