StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SERV.ST$0.00+5.00%
Fair $0.00+0.0%

SERV.ST

Servana AB

Healthcare / Medical Instruments & SuppliesStockholm

$0.00

+0.00 (+5.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.00Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 10/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-12.5M · quality 45.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

10/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -9.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SERV.STLocal privado en este navegador · Servana AB
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$30M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-959.5%

↓

Gross Margin

90.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

SERV.ST price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.004Periodo -99.8%
Fair value: $0.004

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-71.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-2.0%

FCF / Net income

0.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $48165.0 · net income $-3.2M · FCF $-958.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

90.0%+63.0% pts

Operating margin

-6637.3%-5928.2% pts

Net margin

-6627.7%-5882.0% pts

FCF margin

-2.0%+840.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$48165.00$48165.00$4.8M$3.6M$2.1M
Net Income$-3.2M$-3.2M$-14.8M$-14.3M$-15.4M
EBITDA$-3.1M$-3.1M$-13.3M$-12.9M$-14.8M
EPS——-0.01-0.01-0.03
Gross Margin90.0%90.0%25.6%55.9%27.0%
Operating Margin-6637.3%-6637.3%-256.1%-390.0%-709.1%
Net Margin-6627.7%-6627.7%-308.5%-392.9%-745.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.710.22—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-958.00$-958.00$-12.5M$-14.0M$-17.4M
Returns
ROE-959.5%-959.5%-348.8%-103.6%-101.0%
Valuation
P/B91.5991.593.012.352.77
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-99.0%-99.0%32.5%75.5%—
EPS Growth——40.7%51.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +10.5%

Total return

+10.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

+10.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+10.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.